saggi1991
when u create a so called water fuelled engine u dissociate H2O to hydrogen which is burnt.... so in short electrical energy is used and water is just a carrier... it is practically impossible to produce a water fuelled engine alone... the first two laws of thermodynamics (which are the pillars of mechanics) are violated.
First off, the laws of thermodynamics are not violated because they do NOT apply. The first and second laws were written to describe steam engines and fire and they do that just fine.
Water fuel however is a bit over the heads of the people that wrote those laws. Water fuel is done by a process that employs acceleration and acceleration is a game changer for a whole bunch of laws of physics. For example, there are three exceptions to the law of force and one of them is if the mass is moving at or near the speed of light.
In the case of water fuel, both Stan Meyer and Dr. Puharich used accelerator coils to extract electron energy from the water which changed the molecular bond angle from 104.45 degrees to 109.28 degrees from center of mass. In this state, the water molecule locks up into a ridged structure and can be shattered into the component gases using ultrasonic energy in an isotropic cavity.
The ignition spark can be extended to increase the burn time and power and the addition of ozone can be added to slow the burn rate due to the energy absorbed by the O3 during the burn. It is explosive not implosive and anyone with even a tiny bit of actual real world experience knows that.
I am not going to give you the details of how Meyer or anyone else built the accelerator coil but it is how most free energy devices and anti-gravity or gravity well propulsion devices work.
1. All free energy devices only do one thing and that is they convert mass into the ATOMIC energy contained within the mass, not the chemical energy.
2. All free energy devices use acceleration to accomplish that task.
3. No free energy devices violate the laws of science.
Sheeple are programmed in science class to believe is is not possible to produce a free energy device but then most people never ask the hard questions like, "how is it that I can move a magnet at a speed 1 meter per second over an inductor and produce a voltage shock wave that moves at the speed of light?" What caused that speed amplification?
The answer is that electricity is mass to atomic energy conversion however they don't teach you that in sheeple school. Add a little acceleration and the rate of mass to atomic energy conversion goes way up. Once you understand what electricity actually is then you can invent free energy devices at will. They are illegal in the US and some forms are probably dangerous to experiment with.
Here is another good question: "Why do electrons move toward the anode at only just under 1 meter per second?"
The answer is that is the rate of electron conversion.Good luck measuring that tiny amount of missing mass even if you ran it for 1000 years. A copper penny has enough atomic energy contained with the mass to run New York City for days.
Take your magical tube cell and fill it up with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Notice how gas production goes up by about 100%??? Now try and burn that gas in a small zip lock bag. Notice how it barely burns? That is what Meyer's air gas processes did, it slowed the burn rate - it is a accelerated laser ozone generator.
I'm not sure who bugs me more, the HHO crowed that can't see the word "composite" of fig 10-4 of Meyer's note in regard to the stainless steel wire and ask themselves what other metal was plated on the surface? Hint - it isn't copper. Or... the kids fresh out of school that think they know what they don't know.
In either case, they do a disservice to science and the evolution of knowledge. Knowledge is experience.
