Replies
Welcome, guest
Join CrazyEngineers to reply, ask questions, and participate in conversations.
CrazyEngineers powered by Jatra Community Platform
-
@tinat-mUKQCr • Sep 6, 2011
There is a trade off in the auxiliary power required to pulverize the coal.
Coal which is crushed finer will, in most cases, burn better (depending on the boiler design) - but if you put 10 MW of power into crushing the coal to get 8 MW of additional power from the generator... your net gain was -2MW (i.e. it was a LOSS). -
@akpower-WAuq3q • Sep 16, 2011
Thanks Tina .It is an accepted fact that auxiliary consumption in a power plant is 10% or less having turbo feed pumps.In no case the power required for pulverization will be more than output of generator. Loss due to unburnt will be much more than additional power for pulverization. However I have not seen designers going in for fine coal pulverization. Only designers can explain . -
@ramani-VR4O43 • Sep 16, 2011
Please have a look at this PPT from IIT Delhi: (You have to paste the id)akpowerThanks Tina .It is an accepted fact that auxiliary consumption in a power plant is 10% or less having turbo feed pumps.In no case the power required for pulverization will be more than output of generator. Loss due to unburnt will be much more than additional power for pulverization. However I have not seen designers going in for fine coal pulverization. Only designers can explain .
web.iitd.ac.in/~pmvs/jgl710/jgl710-23.ppt
This is another:
#-Link-Snipped-# -
@devil26-85wfnz • Dec 22, 2011
perhaps handling finer coal becomes difficult!!!