CrazyEngineers
CrazyEngineers
  • Moto X(first Gen.) Vs Moto G(2nd Gen.)
    Which is better if you consider the performance as the parameter within the exceptional price???
    #-Link-Snipped-#
    #-Link-Snipped-#
    #-Link-Snipped-#
    #-Link-Snipped-#
    #-Link-Snipped-# #-Link-Snipped-# #-Link-Snipped-# #-Link-Snipped-# #-Link-Snipped-# #-Link-Snipped-# #-Link-Snipped-#
    #-Link-Snipped-#
     Replies
Howdy guest!
Dear guest, you must be logged-in to participate on CrazyEngineers. We would love to have you as a member of our community. Consider creating an account or login.
Replies

  • Abhishek Rawal

    Member • Jan 7, 2015

    If your budget is tight then Moto G 2014 is pretty good device. While Moto X has some very cool features (that G nor E has) plus performance plus superdope high ppi screen, but it all comes with increased price. [However Motorola's Turbo is killer device]

    I have opinions on mobile device that noone should spend more than 15K on a mobile phone. 6 more months & your high-end device will become mid-range & eventually you'll be desiring for another new device.
    Are you sure? This action cannot be undone.
    Cancel

  • Ankita Katdare

    Administrator • Jan 7, 2015

    Best way is to compare specifications if you want to really go in for every detail.

    Moto X has better RAM - 2048 MB compared to Moto G's 1024 MB,
    better battery 2200 mAh vs 2070 mAh,
    better screen resolution 1080 p HD vs 720 p HD,
    better camera 10 MP vs 8 MP,
    better screen AMOLED vs IPS LCD.

    That said, Moto G (2nd Gen) features are more than enough for any average user.
    So, check your budget and choose the smartphone that fits in it.
    Are you sure? This action cannot be undone.
    Cancel
Home Channels Search Login Register