Are the candidates who saw leaked CAT 2010 results unethical?

I am simply amazed at how the designation of CAT Convener simply degrades "intelligent" professors from IIMs to shambles and gives them the ability to stun the world with their illogical brains !!

<a href="https://maverick-blogger.blogspot.com/2009/12/cbt-cat-09-evaluation-and-ranking.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">CBT CAT 09 - Evaluation and Ranking</a> and I thought that CAT 2010 was comparatively well managed - (apart from a few "incorrect" questions that kept popping up here and there in almost all slots, but of course they have been handled "psycometrically" by these brilliant people - is it ethical to allow wrong questions in an exam in the first place, Mr Rai ?), but then they had to mess it up with results.

Instead of admitting a security leak by keeping the page - scorecard.catiim.in as open on the "free" internet, this guy goes on to say that it was unethical for students to visit the website and check their results. Either this guy is super genius and never had curiosity about any of his exams' results or half of the CAT aspirants are unethical, as he points out !!

I have a few questions for Mr. Rai -

1) is it ethical on your part to have incorrect questions with no matching answer in an exam like CAT where the ratio is a sickening 2.5 lacs / 1000 seats for the "prestigious" IIMs ?
2) is it ethical on your part to have an unsecured website to be allowed for testing and calling visitors of that site unethical after that ?
3) and last but not the least, in an exam where even 1 mark means make or break for the students, "psycometrically" balancing marks and normalizing them based on the perceptions of "difficulty" level across 20 slots is not really something that makes sense. Is it ethical to rank everyone on the same scale of percentile if everyone is answering different questions ?

( remember that when GRE / GMAT does that, the admissions aren't based on your rank / percentile in the exam, but rather on the marks you score. ) Anyway, I am sure that he has just followed the previous CAT Convenor's footsteps and highlighted the adamant arrogance instead of accepting their mistakes and rectifying them.

To end my ire on a pleasant note, I would like to thank Mr Rai - that he won't take any action against those who looked at their score card by typing a URL in their address bar. How considerate of him to excuse us unethical people!! And next time onwards, please mention it clearly when you will be testing the results / website, we will be playing ludo / snake & ladders at that time instead of using the freely available internet.

Cheers,
Suyash