Wikipedia Dependence

😀Its true.But after all we all are responsible for what is wikipedia today.We Should always make correction in wkipedia data if we notice any irregularity.
To reach a golden mean we should also search other sites to cross check the info.😀

Depending entirely on Wikipedia will be laziness I think.
Wikipedia has extremely high standards. Check it out on "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia"
But still one cannot neglect self analysis. If someone is dissatisfied with Wikipedia, he/she should check out other sources which he/she considers reliable.

I agree with you laziness point abhishek. But how can we come to know that the information we are checking out at wikipedia is correct or not.

Actually this happened in my 6th semester. We were given one assignment. Some of my friends referred wikipedia for the assignment content and I referred some other site which I found from google search. And our assignment was totally different as we have chosen altogether different topics. 😒

And recently my interviewer also discussed the same thing with me in while interviewing me. He told me that sometimes they also have to suffer from the consequences of wrong information available on net.😔

Come on friends, we need more points.. Lets do something for wikipedia

Wikipedia is generally trusted worldwide for its authenticity of information. But this trend is so deep rooted that recently while referring a book I referred Wiki for some clear explanation. Surprise surprise! The statements used in the book were same word by word. I hope the author didn't use Wiki as his reference. Also Wikipedia doesn't explain concepts properly. Also since a particular post is edited by many the concept could be twisted. So for understanding of concepts it is better to use books and for general informative purposes Wikipedia rocks.

Same was the case with me, Shreyasm. One of my teachers used to make the notes from wikipedia. When we noticed this, we left making notes for that teacher.

I think Wikipedia is a great STARTING POINT in research or looking for information on a topic to get a basic understanding. From there, an individual can delve deeper to explore a topic in more specialized, detailed research.

Well, you would use any other encyclopaedia just as a reference, right?

Say, if you have a hard copy of the Britannica or the Encarta encyclopaedia..

You would use it to refer to any info you need. You would not use it to understand
the concepts or to try and learn something totally new... Because, an encyclopaedia is just a book for reference..

Similarly, Wikipedia should also ideally be used for getting to know something new or to refresh our memory about something we already knew..
And, wikipedia also does a very good job of verifying the info that's present. I have not encountered many erroneous info in it til now..

Absolutely gohm and silverscorpian. I complete go with your statements.😀

Same case here too..
I have a teacher who teaches Theory of Machines to us. But when he finds himself lacking in explanations for some, he usually tells us to refer Wikipedia to know more..!?
As it seems its a way for him to escape from our questions.:razz: