Should we believe 'scientific studies'?
As a technology blogger, I've to keep up to date with all things technology and science and in the last few years of blogging, I've found out something - the 'scientific studies' that are published by the Universities are often refuted and new studies are put out. Maybe that's how it's meant to be; but I'm now wondering if we should really believe these studies.
The point I'm trying to make is how little we know about things around us. The though comes after #-Link-Snipped-# that says life existed on Earth 580 million years before what scientists believed it to be.
Maybe the strongest argument out there can be our brains are not evolved enough to understand the 'reality' around us. Our science tries to make sense out of the things that we can 'sense'. But maybe the actual 'reality' could be entirely different than what we can 'sense'.
I secretly believe that in future everything we believe would be challenged. All the 'science' will be proven to be super different from what we think it is.
I was just loud thinking. Would love to hear your thoughts.
The point I'm trying to make is how little we know about things around us. The though comes after #-Link-Snipped-# that says life existed on Earth 580 million years before what scientists believed it to be.
Maybe the strongest argument out there can be our brains are not evolved enough to understand the 'reality' around us. Our science tries to make sense out of the things that we can 'sense'. But maybe the actual 'reality' could be entirely different than what we can 'sense'.
I secretly believe that in future everything we believe would be challenged. All the 'science' will be proven to be super different from what we think it is.
I was just loud thinking. Would love to hear your thoughts.
0
