Should we believe only in what science has answers to?
As engineers, the base of everything we do is science. Engineering itself is application of science and the laws that have been proven to work in any given frame of reference. We take pride in being scientific in our knowledge and analysis. But we also know that science does not have answers to everything! Plus, the established and accepted theories of science have been debunked and new theories have been established. Which means, what we all know today and has worked may not be just what we thought it is.
A hardcore believer in science would have rejected the fact that a person speaking in US can be heard & seen almost in real time by a person in India; because sound cannot really travel through air so long. But the science itself made it happen through radio and TV. I think you got the point.
The debate topic is clear - should we only believe in what science can answer? Should we blindly reject what the science cannot prove or has not proven so far? Does that make us close minded or open minded?
PS:
The inspiration for this debate comes from @#-Link-Snipped-# 's post -
Abhishek RawalWhen I was in 10th grade, my Sanskrit teacher told me that German is fork of Sanskrit. She was learning German at that time. But, since I am a Science student, I only believe in proof.