
Member • Feb 7, 2014
Should we believe only in what science has answers to?
A hardcore believer in science would have rejected the fact that a person speaking in US can be heard & seen almost in real time by a person in India; because sound cannot really travel through air so long. But the science itself made it happen through radio and TV. I think you got the point.
The debate topic is clear - should we only believe in what science can answer? Should we blindly reject what the science cannot prove or has not proven so far? Does that make us close minded or open minded?
PS:
The inspiration for this debate comes from @#-Link-Snipped-# 's post -
Abhishek RawalWhen I was in 10th grade, my Sanskrit teacher told me that German is fork of Sanskrit. She was learning German at that time. But, since I am a Science student, I only believe in proof.