Keeping Up With Moore's Law : Necessary ?
Each & every year we see the processors are getting compact & processing power is increased.because the size of the transistors are decreased & thus more transistors are used in single architecture resulting in greater performance.
But, soon this Moore's law will break. We have seen 35 nm architecture 3 years ago has moved to 14nm architecture today & soon by 2020 the transistors will run up against atomic size & Moore's law will break.
Moore's law don't have any fundamentals of physics related to it. It's mere psychological + silicon industry development assumption.
So, is it necessary to keep up with Moore's law ? Intel is firmly trying to do so, While AMD is not.
Why so much concern is given to the Moore's law which is not based on any theoretical or practical analysis ?
Is it necessary to keep up with Moore's law ?
Shouldn't Intel should focus in reliability/power consumption & some addon feature of processor rather than keeping up with Moore's law ?
Share your opinion, CEans.
But, soon this Moore's law will break. We have seen 35 nm architecture 3 years ago has moved to 14nm architecture today & soon by 2020 the transistors will run up against atomic size & Moore's law will break.
Moore's law don't have any fundamentals of physics related to it. It's mere psychological + silicon industry development assumption.
So, is it necessary to keep up with Moore's law ? Intel is firmly trying to do so, While AMD is not.
Why so much concern is given to the Moore's law which is not based on any theoretical or practical analysis ?
Is it necessary to keep up with Moore's law ?
Shouldn't Intel should focus in reliability/power consumption & some addon feature of processor rather than keeping up with Moore's law ?
Share your opinion, CEans.
0