Is highhandedness or oneupmanship of Mr.Modi justified in lieu of progress?
Banking on the Pro development Gujarat model and strategy and being Prime minister he did steer forward many policies,but all through the way a question always nagged, is this totally centralised leadership model working for the democracy like India? Maybe not.This was much evident from the recourse to ordinance route for the passage of important bills without parliamentary debates, scrapping of planning commission being replaced by NITI Aayog now under the chairmanship of PM,direct involvement of PM in various other administrative matters etc.
More than all this the PM has come to be known as a name synonymic to development, hasn't it all become a lot to ask for from a mortal?
Doesn't it concentrate all the energy on PMO? Consequently it means more responsibility and accountability for him,whether or not it can be delivered on is another question.
One side of the story is for a country like India a decisive leadership was the need of the day, to remove the rut and clear the mess.On the other hand there's always a very thin line between being boldly decisive and being autocratic even in the enforcement of one's vision. To tread that line requires great courage and strength of conviction. Is Mr.Modi successfully maintaining the balance? I think it will be imperative for us to think and ponder over the situation on whether or not we are overlooking the democratic process in trading it for economic progress. In the long run,it sure is going to affect things,like voter behaviour and the way they look at democracy and choose.
Do post your views people😀