jeffrey samuel
... the general definition which i give for HATE SPEECHES is the tendency of using once vocabulary to instigate a sense of anger and insecurity to the listener
The definition is the problem. It's impossible to define it objectively.
In fact, it's almost impossible to give an example that wouldn't cause someone to accuse me of being inflammatory. But let me recount an example that was very big news a number of years ago. It was in the news #-Link-Snipped-#, #-Link-Snipped-#, #-Link-Snipped-#, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_buffalo_incident" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Water Buffalo Incident</a> and other places.
A college student was trying to study but some people outside were making a lot of noise. He leaned out the window and shouted "
Shut up, you water buffalo."
Why did he shout that? "
Water buffalo" is a rough translation of the Hebrew word "
behay-mah," which in his Jewish upbringing was commonly used as a rebuff to mean "thoughtless person" or ''fool."
What did the black women he was shouting at think he meant? They thought water buffalo were indigenous to Africa (as it turns out, they're not) so he must have been making a racial slur. They called the campus police. He was accused of hate speech and officially charged with "racial harassment."
The epitaph "
hate speech" is often thrown at people which the thrower disagrees with. The use of the phrase, in my observations, is often the wrong. And it's alarming to now learn that India is doing the throwing.