Replies
Welcome, guest
Join CrazyEngineers to reply, ask questions, and participate in conversations.
CrazyEngineers powered by Jatra Community Platform
-
@shalini-goel14-ASmC2J • Mar 3, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
Imagine a round table with diameter equal to fifteen times the diameter of a saucer.
Question: How many saucers can be accommodated on the table, without overlapping and not surpassing the table boundaries.
Answer: I guess the answer is 225 😕
No of saucers = (Area of table)/ (Area of each saucer)
Let us assume diameter of each saucer is D, then
Area of saucer A[sub]saucer[/sub]= ( pi * D[sup]2[/sup] )/4
diameter of table = 15D (As said in question), so
Area of table A[sub]table[/sub]= ( pi * (15D)[sup]2[/sup] )/4
No of saucers = A[sub]table[/sub] / A[sub]saucer[/sub]
= 225
Is this right? 😕 -
@thebigk • Mar 3, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
You mean Two Twenty Five? :shock: ! -
@silverscorpion-iJKtdQ • Mar 3, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
That wont be correct because, there will be gaps between the saucers. They cant be closely packed and so, ratio of areas wont give the correct answer.
As for the correct answer, I'm working it out and will post it after I figure it out.. -
@shalini-goel14-ASmC2J • Mar 3, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
@Scorpion thanks for the hint
I didn't took spaces into account.
Answer is 64 This time I think I am right. Right?
Explanation - See first coming from circumference - we can have 15 saucers at the circumfernce ok
How?
Circumference[sub]table[/sub] / Circumference[sub]saucer[/sub]
= pi * (15D) / pi * D
=15 saucers
Now again a circle of diameter 13D is created for you right?
How?
15D- D -D (each D from two ends of the diameter )
=13D
Then again applying same funda as above we can place 13 saucers in that circle
Continuing so...
We will get the series like following
15 + 13 +11 + 9 + 7+ 5 + 3 + 1
=Using AP formula ( (2 * a + (n-1) * d)* (n/2) )
= ( ( 2 * 1 + (8-1) * 2 ) * (8/2))
=64
I got answer as 64. Now I don't know how much correct it is ? 😔 -
@durga-TpX3gO • Mar 3, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
I am still stuck at 225 😔 -
@saandeep-sreerambatla-hWHU1M • Mar 4, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
I have followed some empirical approach and found the answer to be 170.
I think this time its wrong.. i cant explain the explanation here will explain it tomorrow by trying it once again.
😎😎 -
@shalini-goel14-ASmC2J • Mar 4, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
Hey guys, last trial from my side . I missed something in my last explanation. 😔
Now my answer is 71. Is this right? -
@thebigk • Mar 4, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
Relax Shalini. -
@silverscorpion-iJKtdQ • Mar 5, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
I think shalini is trying all numbers from 1 to 225 in a trial and error method. 😀 😀 -
@shalini-goel14-ASmC2J • Mar 5, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
silverscorpionI think shalini is trying all numbers from 1 to 225 in a trial and error method. 😀 😀
Ha ha ha..😁 Atleast I was trying something and what you are doing waiting for a table whose diameter is 15 times the diameter of saucers and then try it? Tell? 😁
-
@durga-TpX3gO • Mar 5, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
168
the diametre is 15 times the diameter of the small bowl.
ie on diamter we can accomodate 15 bowls.
ie centre one bowl and on each side of the centre bowl 7 .
same is on the second perpendicular diameter
to have maximum utilisation of space i would prefer to put second row of bowls between 2 bowls of first row.
now I have this would be only for counting no of rows i can accomodate
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
so I can arrange 7 rows above and below
so counting 15+14+13+12+11+10+9=84
on both sides = 168 -
@saandeep-sreerambatla-hWHU1M • Mar 6, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
I too followed the same approach.
i got the answer is 171 😎😎 -
@silverscorpion-iJKtdQ • Mar 6, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
durga168
the diametre is 15 times the diameter of the small bowl.
ie on diamter we can accomodate 15 bowls.
ie centre one bowl and on each side of the centre bowl 7 .
same is on the second perpendicular diameter
to have maximum utilisation of space i would prefer to put second row of bowls between 2 bowls of first row.
now I have this would be only for counting no of rows i can accomodate
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
so I can arrange 7 rows above and below
so counting 15+14+13+12+11+10+9=84
on both sides = 168Seems you made a mistake. Following this approach, we'll get the answer to be,
n = 15 + 2*(14+13+12+11+10+9+8)
n = 15 + 154
n = 169.
because, the center row only contains 15 saucers. There are seven rows above and below the canter row, and so, seven numbers from 15 should be included.
You left eight twice, and included an extra 15. So, you got 168.
Of course, i dont know if this is the correct answer. I just corrected the mistake in your approach. -
@durga-TpX3gO • Mar 7, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
dude. you are absolutely correct. I messed up with calculation. Thanks !!😀
Biggie high time you say out the answer 😛 -
@differential-0aMwAJ • Mar 8, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
169. Am I right?? -
@shalini-goel14-ASmC2J • Mar 8, 2009
Re: How many saucerrs on the table
shalini_goel14@Scorpion thanks for the hint
I didn't took spaces into account.
Answer is 64 This time I think I am right. Right?
Explanation - See first coming from circumference - we can have 15 saucers at the circumfernce ok
How?
Circumference[sub]table[/sub] / Circumference[sub]saucer[/sub]
= pi * (15D) / pi * D
=15 saucers
Now again a circle of diameter 13D is created for you right?
How?
15D- D -D (each D from two ends of the diameter )
=13D
Then again applying same funda as above we can place 13 saucers in that circle
Continuing so...
We will get the series like following
15 + 13 +11 + 9 + 7+ 5 + 3 + 1
=Using AP formula ( (2 * a + (n-1) * d)* (n/2) )
= ( ( 2 * 1 + (8-1) * 2 ) * (8/2))
=64
I got answer as 64. Now I don't know how much correct it is ? 😔
Can't believe it , it was me giving such a non sense explanation. (Don't know where was my brain at that time 😕 )
Guys !! Please ignore it completely.:sshhh:
I guess durga, Scorpion and Differential are right ? -
@arsh86-pwVJG2 • Mar 21, 2009
i think it is 173.
hello
Big K...........
tell us the right ans... -
@thebigk • Mar 21, 2009
I don't know the answer. If someone can logically explain the answer and everyone else agrees - we'll have the right answer.
-
@raj87verma88-ZpL2Wn • Mar 21, 2009
What? But you posted the question.
-
@durga-TpX3gO • Mar 21, 2009
aha!
Thats what. all have almost given up with the answer anf BIggie throws the bolt saying he doesnot know the answer!
mean! -
@saandeep-sreerambatla-hWHU1M • Mar 21, 2009
The answer given by Silver scorpion is correct logically too.