![Ankur Murarka](https://www.crazyengineers.com/img/avatar.jpg)
Member • Jul 6, 2006
Member • Jul 6, 2006
Member • Jul 6, 2006
Member • Jul 7, 2006
Member • Jul 8, 2006
Member • Jul 31, 2006
Administrator • Jul 31, 2006
Member • Jul 31, 2006
Member • Jul 31, 2006
well i would like to contradict on your point aditi. i don't think there is any such notion that people without an attractive face don't do well in cinema. kajol was not very good looking in her initial stages but she always managed to win awards because she is very talented. same case goes with many actors and actresses.aditiAJAY DEVGAN!! :sleeping: HAV TO THINK A LOT ABT IT!! HE ACTS WELL NO DOUBT BUT
SERIOUSLY TELLING ACTORS WITHOUT GOOD LOOKS DONT FIT IN CINEMA...
N HE Z ONE OF DAT KIND.. WAT U THINK???
Member • Jul 31, 2006
Member • Jul 31, 2006
well there is a good fan following for esha too 😉crookBollywood is crappy. People with scary faces do get roles with big banners.
Isha Deol, for example. 😁
Member • Jul 31, 2006
Member • Aug 1, 2006
Member • Aug 1, 2006
Member • Aug 1, 2006
well aditi you have given a choice without any basis!!! question is not complete only with shahrukh and ajay. comparisons are made on the basis of quality and talent and not by the name. and its not mandatory that if given a choice between the movies of these two celebrities, everyone will go for shahrukh. for me, if given a choice between duplicate and hum dil de chuke sanam, i'll go for the second one. if given a choice between asoka and bhagat singh, again i'll go for the second one.aditiyae yae yae.. i do agree to all of you that a good actor is the one whose acting is superb and ajay is one of such actors. but tell me one thing that if you have an option to choose between two movies, one of sharukh khan and another of ajay devgan, which one are you going to choose?? i think most of us would always prefer to watch sharukhs movie!!!!
Member • Aug 1, 2006
Member • Aug 2, 2006
Member • Aug 4, 2006