Kaustubh Katdare
Just stumbled upon Taxation in Switzerland: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Switzerland" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Taxation In Switzerland</a> . It's quite amazing that Swiss people don't pay so many taxes.
That makes me wonder - if Switzerland can survive without collecting 'Road Tax' , 'Excise Tax', 'VAT', 'Toll Tax' and so on; why can't other countries.
Your thoughts? [PS: May not be a debate topic, but I'm sure we'll have few extreme thoughts on this topic] 😀
Most people equate income to livelihood and hard work. We hate that our hard work to feed our families and pay the bills should be taxed. The truth is, that it isn't taxed too much, especially if you're not making a lot of money, and that income tax is a great way to make very wealthy people pay more, because they need the money less.
The scary side of the coin is what would be taxed instead of income. The money has to come from somewhere.
Most proponents of abolishing income tax push for bigger sales taxes and bigger property taxes. These taxes affect the lowest income people the most. Everybody has to buy food, clothing, transportation and shelter. We all have to spend ~ 30k a year to live. Survival should never be taxed.
Ideally we would all have the first 30K of our annual sales taxes reimbursed. After that, buying things that are more like luxuries can be taxed.
Property is the American dream: Owning a home, a car and a little pit of land to keep them on is part of our image of what we believe everyone should be able to achieve. If we start taxing property heavily, then the wealthiest individuals will pay only a little more for their vacation homes etc., while every homeowner in the country will feel the pressure.
Again, this is OK if it's a progressive tax that doesn't get very big unless it's "extra" land for more than just living on. An acre or two in a suburban town or a hundred acres out in rural Montana should be considered your home and not taxed heavily. But if you own more property than you "need", such as thousands of acres of land or large estates near major cities, then a property tax can encourage that land to be used (make money, take an active role in the economy) or be taxed more heavily.
Most importantly, I believe that all taxes should balance each other and take wealth and income into consideration. Property, income and sales taxes should be held as low as possible for those with little ability to pay, allowing minimums for spending, property ownership and income before taxes become a burden. I fear the growing inequality of wealth in our great nation and that too many people are renting their homes, living on credit and loans, and being overtaxed on their income, and that the American Dream is harder to reach than ever before.
We should be wary of broad yes/no questions like this and voting on such things without understanding the alternatives and repercussions.
We should also look into the systems that drive money and wealth upwards and away from the lifeblood of the economy (us, the people) and think about how we can tax the wealthiest individuals who don't need to work hard and earn a paycheck.