![Kaustubh](https://www.crazyengineers.com/img/avatar.jpg)
Member • Jan 19, 2014
Member • Jan 19, 2014
Member • Jan 20, 2014
Administrator • Jan 20, 2014
Member • Jan 20, 2014
It's not about visibility - it's about apparent benefit. A higher resolution is only useful if you are going to zoom in; not when you are going to zoom out. Take an A4 size photograph and shrink it to stamp size - how much detail can you really perceive?Kaustubh Katdare@#-Link-Snipped-# - Are you sure that 4K is visible only when the screen size is 60"? Galaxy S5's getting a 2K display already and I think we already have 4K monitors.
@#-Link-Snipped-# - Where are you, fella?
Administrator • Jan 20, 2014
Member • Jan 20, 2014
Objectively, it's not. You can't really differentiate 4K content playing in FHD and 4K TV of the same size. But then psychology plays an important part in perception of reality. BTW if you do "see" that difference, you're seeing more than there "is".Kaustubh KatdareI agree on the zooming in point. The difference, however is very visible when you're looking at a full HD and a UltraHD TV - the images are way sharper and more life-like.
Member • Jan 21, 2014
Kaustubh Katdare@#-Link-Snipped-# - Are you sure that 4K is visible only when the screen size is 60"? Galaxy S5's getting a 2K display already and I think we already have 4K monitors.
@#-Link-Snipped-# - Where are you, fella?
Member • Jan 21, 2014
When coming to visibility factor between full hd and ultra hd , the differences are undetectable.There is no doubt that there is difference between ful hd and ultra hd images , but they are detectable or visible only at a distance of 2 feet from the screen.If we move more than 7 feet or so,we find both of them as almost equal.Kaustubh KatdareI agree on the zooming in point. The difference, however is very visible when you're looking at a full HD and a UltraHD TV - the images are way sharper and more life-like.