CE Logical Question: Part-I
This thread is dedicated to CAT Logical Section
Here only Post the CAT logical reasoning questions.
Let me start first,,,
Choose anyone answer😀
1)The senate candidate expressed outrage that few judges have any background in technology, yet they try to resolve cases involving high tech companies. He stated that not one federal judge has a degree or any experience in compter technology
A promising response to this concern, arguing that things are not as bad as they might seem, could involve which of the following claims?
Here only Post the CAT logical reasoning questions.
Let me start first,,,
Choose anyone answer😀
1)The senate candidate expressed outrage that few judges have any background in technology, yet they try to resolve cases involving high tech companies. He stated that not one federal judge has a degree or any experience in compter technology
A promising response to this concern, arguing that things are not as bad as they might seem, could involve which of the following claims?
- Most of the public policy questions in this area are really about the morality and the value of scientific and technological developments. They do not require much technical understanding beyond that of a layperson.
- Computer scientists, by and large, have little interest in politics and public policy. It would be difficult to find scientists with the degree of commitment required for a serious contribution to the judicial system.
- There is a lack of people who are qualified in both technical and legal areas of expertise.
- There is very little opportunity for, and indeed little need for, technical expertise in the judicial branch. There is therefore almost no way for a technical specialist to rise through the ranks to a top-level position in government.
- The rewards of a life as a judge, in terms of both money and prestige, are not high enough to attract top-flight technical experts to this area.
Replies
-
Rajni Jain
Answer isms_cs1)The senate candidate expressed outrage that few judges have any background in technology, yet they try to resolve cases involving high tech companies. He stated that not one federal judge has a degree or any experience in compter technology
A promising response to this concern, arguing that things are not as bad as they might seem, could involve which of the following claims?- Most of the public policy questions in this area are really about the morality and the value of scientific and technological developments. They do not require much technical understanding beyond that of a layperson.
- Computer scientists, by and large, have little interest in politics and public policy. It would be difficult to find scientists with the degree of commitment required for a serious contribution to the judicial system.
- There is a lack of people who are qualified in both technical and legal areas of expertise.
- There is very little opportunity for, and indeed little need for, technical expertise in the judicial branch. There is therefore almost no way for a technical specialist to rise through the ranks to a top-level position in government.
- The rewards of a life as a judge, in terms of both money and prestige, are not high enough to attract top-flight technical experts to this area.
1) Most of the public policy questions in this area are really about the morality and the value of scientific and technological developments. They do not require much technical understanding beyond that of a layperson.
Please confirm. -
ms_csSuperb .You are correct CG 😀
1)The senate candidate expressed outrage that few judges have any background in technology, yet they try to resolve cases involving high tech companies. He stated that not one federal judge has a degree or any experience in compter technology
A promising response to this concern, arguing that things are not as bad as they might seem, could involve which of the following claims?
- Most of the public policy questions in this area are really about the morality and the value of scientific and technological developments. They do not require much technical understanding beyond that of a layperson.
- Computer scientists, by and large, have little interest in politics and public policy. It would be difficult to find scientists with the degree of commitment required for a serious contribution to the judicial system.
- There is a lack of people who are qualified in both technical and legal areas of expertise.
- There is very little opportunity for, and indeed little need for, technical expertise in the judicial branch. There is therefore almost no way for a technical specialist to rise through the ranks to a top-level position in government.
- The rewards of a life as a judge, in terms of both money and prestige, are not high enough to attract top-flight technical experts to this area.
-
ms_csThis thread will be helpful to solve the logical reasoning.
#-Link-Snipped-# -
ms_csQ2
Beautiful beaches attract people, no doubt about it. Just look at this city's beautiful beaches, which are among the most overcrowded beaches in the state.
Which of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning most similar to the one exhibited in the argument above?
1 Moose and bear usually appear at the same drinking ...........hole at the same time of day. Therefore, moose and ...........bear must grow thirsty at about the same time.
2 Children who are scolded severely tend to misbehave ...........more often than other children. Hence if a child is ...........not scolded severely that child is less likely to ...........misbehave.
3 This software program helps increase the work ...........efficiency of its users. As a result, these users ...........have more free time for other activities.
4 During warm weather my dog suffers from fleas ...........more so than during cooler weather. Therefore, ...........fleas must thrive in a warm environment.
5 Pesticides are known to cause anemia in some people. ...........However, most anemic people live in regions where ...........pesticides are not commonly used. -
ms_csAnswer the following questions based on the passage below.
A group of three or four has to be selected from seven persons. Among the seven are two women, Fiza and Kavita, and five men: Ram, Shyam, David, Peter and Rahim. Ram would not like to be in the group if Shyam is also selected. Shyam and Rahim want to be selected together in the group. Kavita would like to be in the group only if David is also there. David, if selected, would not like Peter in the group. Ram would like to be in the group only if Peter is also there. David insists that Fiza be selected in case he is there in the group.
Q3. Which of the following statements is true?
a. Kavita and Ram can be part of a group of four.
b. A group of four can have two women.
c. A group of four can have all four men.
d. None of the above
Q4. Which of the following is a feasible group of four?
a. Ram, Peter, Fiza, Rahim
b. Shyam, Rahim, Kavita, David
c. Shyam, Rahim, Fiza, David
d. Fiza, David, Ram, Peter
Q5. Which of the following is a feasible group of three?
a. David, Ram, Rahim
b. Peter, Shyam, Rahim
c. Kavita, David, Shyam
d. Fiza, David, Ram -
Saandeep SreerambatlaMy Answers are
3. C
4. B
5. C
Are they correct? 😕 -
silverscorpionI got the answers as follows:
3) C
4) C
5) B
So, is it correct?? -
ms_cs
3rd is correctEnglish-ScaredMy Answers are
3. C
4. B
5. C
Are they correct? 😕
the answers for 4 and 5 is wrong. -
ms_cs
Yes You are correct buddy😀silverscorpionI got the answers as follows:
3) C
4) C
5) B
So, is it correct?? -
Saandeep SreerambatlaFine , will some one explain the answers? I'm looking forward to some real explanations of those answers.
-
silverscorpionOk. I'll explain.
You answered the third one right. So, skipping it.
Q4. Which of the following is a feasible group of four?
Answer is C.
a. Ram, Peter, Fiza, Rahim
b. Shyam, Rahim, Kavita, David
c. Shyam, Rahim, Fiza, David
d. Fiza, David, Ram, Peter
Choice a is wrong because Shyam is not there, while Rahim is present.
b is wrong because David is there, but Fiza is not there.
d is wrong because David and peter can't be in the group together.
Q5. Which of the following is a feasible group of three?
Answer is B.
a. David, Ram, Rahim
b. Peter, Shyam, Rahim
c. Kavita, David, Shyam
d. Fiza, David, Ram
a is wrong because Shyam is not there, while Rahim is present.
c is wrong because David is there, but Fiza is not there.
d is wrong because Peter is not there while Ram is there.
Is it clear??
You are reading an archived discussion.
Related Posts
* Hopefully no intro needed why I started this thread *
Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency are kinds of problems where first we need to decide whether we can get...
In most of the cases, when we r using filler metal while welding, then why don't we use same filler metal as that of base metal
Important Tips for Logical Reasoning
Study the question carefully. A brief explanation of why each choice is correct or incorrect follows each practice question. If you understand this reasoning for...
hi everyone . i am using ubuntu 9.04 .could anyone let me know where i can get the stabe version of wine like wine 1.0.1...... and i find only development...
Can anyone explain Diffusion Capacitance of a PN juntion diode. All I know is that it comes into play when the diode is Forward biased and increases exponentially with increase...