Optics: Deriving thickness of a film

we all are familiar with non reflecting thin films
let me discuss about the concept we use to derive the thickness of the film.
we made to satisfy the condition of minima for two light ray emerging out after reflection.
now my question is that.........
we know when two rays of interfere they for maxima as well as minima. thus how we can say that the film is non reflection since the

Replies

  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    If the two waves are exactly 180 degrees out of phase there will be total destructive interference. This can happen if the film has a thickness of Lamda/4. However. it will work only for that wavelength that is four times the film thickness.
  • lal
    lal
    Non reflecting films, so, doesn't absorb any radiation? I actually thought they absorbed radiation without allowing it to reflect. I was thinking in that case non-reflective coatings on mobile phone displays and all should get heated up when exposed to sunlight.

    Well, destructive interference is interesting. The name of these coatings should have been something else as scientist said.
  • the scientist
    the scientist
    bioramani
    If the two waves are exactly 180 degrees out of phase there will be total destructive interference. This can happen if the film has a thickness of Lamda/4. However. it will work only for that wavelength that is four times the film thickness.
    thats impossible.......
    that will result into a contradiction to law of conservation of energy......
  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    the scientist
    thats impossible.......
    that will result into a contradiction to law of conservation of energy......
    The First Law of Thermodynamics is inviolate. Either that energy appears as heat or (in the case of normal incidence) will enhance the transmitted light.
    There will be destructive interference if there are two waves exactly out of phase. I am sure that you are aware of the noise cancelling head phones. That is how they work, by destructive interference of the noise sound wave and the out of phase wave generated by the electronics. In this case the energy appears as heat. However, the calories are so few that it is unnoticed.
  • the scientist
    the scientist
    bioramani
    The First Law of Thermodynamics is
    inviolate. Either that energy appears as heat or (in the case of normal incidence) will enhance the transmitted light.
    There will be destructive interference if there are two waves exactly out of phase. I am sure that you are aware of the noise cancelling head phones. That is how they work, by destructive interference of the noise sound wave and the out of phase wave generated by the electronics. In this case the energy appears as heat. However, the calories are so few that it is unnoticed.
  • the scientist
    the scientist
    now how we can talk of two rays.......
    instead we a have two beams of light......in which we have no. of rays .if one pair satsfies the condition of minima at an angle then other pair will form minima at other angle..... thus redistribution of energy is there......
  • the scientist
    the scientist
    now how we can talk of two rays.......
    instead we a have two beams of light......in which we have no. of rays .if one pair satsfies the condition of minima at an angle then other pair will form minima at other angle..... thus redistribution of energy is there......
  • the scientist
    the scientist
    the scientist
    now how we can talk of two rays.......

    i meant to say that two light rays which are coming out after reflection as in thin films.... should behave as the two interfering light rays behave normally as in young's double slit experiment...
    instead we a have two beams of light......in which we have no. of rays .if one pair satsfies the condition of minima at an angle then other pair will form minima at other angle..... thus redistribution of energy is there......
  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    the scientist
    now how we can talk of two rays.......
    instead we a have two beams of light......in which we have no. of rays .if one pair satsfies the condition of minima at an angle then other pair will form minima at other angle..... thus redistribution of energy is there......
    The argument does not consider how many rays there are, nor whether all are in phase. Each ray and its own reflection at a film which is quarter wave thick will be out of phase. If the beam has a mixed bunch of waves the reflected beam will also have the same mix. However. every wave will be out of phase with its own corresponding incident wave.
  • the scientist
    the scientist
    how can u say that?????
    when a pair forms maxima at some inclination..... then at some other inclination psth difference can't remain same. it will vary. hence the condition of maxima will not be satisfied!!!!!!!! again
  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    If you take a sine wave and superimpose the same wave shifted by 180 degrees you get essentially a mirror image. Every point on one wave has an exact negative point, which is why you get destructive interference. There is no maxima or minima.
  • the scientist
    the scientist
    then why not this thing happens in case of young's double slit experiment......
  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    the scientist
    then why not this thing happens in case of young's double slit experiment......
    That is exactly what happens in the double slit experiment. Each slit acts as a source of a spherical wave front. Since the same source of light illuminates both the waves are in phase. However, the phase at different points on the spherical front depends on the distance from the slit. Whichever wave is 180 degrees out of phase destructively interferes producing a dark line. Whichever wave is in phase constructively interferes producing a band brighter than the original ray. The pattern therefore is alternating bands of dark and bright bands. As you said earlier, the total energy remains the same, but redistributed.

    If you have the time watch this video from MIT, which not only explains the phenomenon, but also lets you experience it first hand making your own simple experiment.

    #-Link-Snipped-#

You are reading an archived discussion.

Related Posts

Real Age has put up this video in which Celebrity trainer Chris Powell and his wife Heidi show how one can burn a lot of calories in just five minutes...
For those serious about Industrial Robotics, here is a list of thirty five videos, many of which are entertaining as well. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...zPYPUXAj8SMM7Kh_IyzilQQFfS-ikA9qv8R-KSCA4CVV0
An opportunity for Bangalore CEans to meet Chris Guillebeau at Crosswords Book Store J.P. Nagar at 7PM on Monday the Third December 2012 for a special discussion session of his...
In a news that can put a smile to every engineer's face, we have IIT Madras' engineering graduates to have a very rich campus recruitment drive. For the first time...
Samsung Galaxy Note owners, get ready for the taste of Jelly Bean, Android 4.1.2. SamMobile has leaked the N7000XXLSA test firmware. So, what does the upgrade bring to your Note?...