conversion of P.E to K.E?

how pressure energy is converted into kinetic energy???

Replies

  • zaveri
    zaveri
    When a fluid exits from a nozzle, its pressure is reduced and velocity is increased. maybe that is how the kinetic energy increases , because kinetic energy has velocity components in it.

    K.E = 1/2 m*v(square), and v is velocity of the fluid
  • viratvicky
    viratvicky
    sir,

    And also one doubt sir, when fluid passes through nozzle at its end nozzle area is less and then how pressure increases? because we have the equation p=F/A here p is inversly to pressure
  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    viratvicky
    sir,
    as you said that, kinetic energy increases with increasing of velocity right? But from that equation K.E=1/2mv^2 kinetic energy is inversly proportional to velocity. That means k.E incereases by decreasing of velocity.
    It is very important to get the concepts right. How on earth did you get the idea of inverse proportionality? The very term KE indicates the dependence on velocity. To take your idea to an absurd level, KE should become infinity at zero velocity!

    The relationship is KE = 0.5mV^2, which means that KE is proportional to the square of the velocity.
    If the velocity doubles KE increases four times.
    You might have got confused by writing the equation as :K.E=1/2mv^2. This means (1/2) x (mV^2).
    Better to think as KE = 0.5mV^2 to avoid confusion.
    #-Link-Snipped-#
  • Harshad Katre
    Harshad Katre
    I think you should learn Bernoulli's principle from any fluid mechanics book.
  • Khartz Di
    Khartz Di
    viratvicky
    how pressure energy is converted into kinetic energy???
    From Bernoullis principle in fluid dynamics, it states that for an inviscid flow,an increase in the speed of the fluid occurs simultaneously with a decrease in pressure,or the decrease in the fluid potential energy.That is energy is conserved(transfered from one form to another),,,
  • ISHAN TOPRE
    ISHAN TOPRE
    I would recommend, all the interested people to apply KE not equal to PE principle to vibrating bodies for example study the effect of oscillations setup in a mercury column ( Hg height increasing and decreasing in manometer). Just see the kind of mathematical errors you get. 😉.
  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    Issue
    I would recommend, all the interested people to apply KE not equal to PE principle to vibrating bodies for example study the effect of oscillations setup in a mercury column ( Hg height increasing and decreasing in manometer). Just see the kind of mathematical errors you get. 😉.
    In a sense vibrating bodies are perfect examples for interchangeability of PE and KE. These bodies are undergoing simple harmonic motion. In vacuum and absence of friction they go on oscillating continuously.
    The mercury in one limb rises up to a maximum height, stops and reverses. The mercury reaches the lowest point in the fall and stops again. The difference in the two levels is the change in PE. If one could measure the speed at different points it will be seen that the maximum speed is at the mid point of the two levels.
  • ISHAN TOPRE
    ISHAN TOPRE
    bioramani
    In a sense vibrating bodies are perfect examples for interchangeability of PE and KE. These bodies are undergoing simple harmonic motion. In vacuum and absence of friction they go on oscillating continuously.
    The mercury in one limb rises up to a maximum height, stops and reverses. The mercury reaches the lowest point in the fall and stops again. The difference in the two levels is the change in PE. If one could measure the speed at different points it will be seen that the maximum speed is at the mid point of the two levels.
    Yes, then the equation reduces to a simple case of mass, damper and spring stiffness. One can easily find the resonant frequency and all the vibrating parameters. Like vibrating bodies there are number of examples where we get interesting outputs equating K.E to PE.
  • Ramani Aswath
    Ramani Aswath
    Issue
    Yes, then the equation reduces to a simple case of mass, damper and spring stiffness. One can easily find the resonant frequency and all the vibrating parameters. Like vibrating bodies there are number of examples where we get interesting outputs equating K.E to PE.
    Issue, you have given the best example of conversion of PE to KE with the simple harmonic motion.
  • viratvicky
    viratvicky
    oh! Yes it's directly proportinal....i did a mistake when typing.
  • viratvicky
    viratvicky
    oh! Yes its directly proportionl. I did a mistake when typing.
  • ISHAN TOPRE
    ISHAN TOPRE
    Not exactly related to vibrations or energy but some interesting application. I got this mail 2 days back. The source is Berkeley labs.

    Good Vibrations: Berkeley Lab and UC Berkeley Researchers Record First Direct Observations of Quantum Effects in an Optomechanical System

    A long-time staple of science fiction is the tractor beam, a technology in which light is used to move massive objects - recall the tractor beam in the movie Star Wars that captured the Millennium Falcon and pulled it into the Death Star. While tractor beams of this sort remain science fiction, beams of light today are being used to mechanically manipulate atoms or tiny glass beads, with rapid progress being made to control increasingly larger objects. Those who see major roles for optomechanical systems in a host of future technologies will take heart in the latest results from a first-of-its-kind experiment.

    Scientists with the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the University of California (UC) Berkeley, using a unique optical trapping system that provides ensembles of ultracold atoms, have recorded the first direct observations of distinctly quantum optical effects - amplification and squeezing - in an optomechanical system. Their findings point the way toward low-power quantum optical devices and enhanced detection of gravitational waves among other possibilities.

    "We've shown for the first time that the quantum fluctuations in a light field are responsible for driving the motions of objects much larger than an electron and could in principle drive the motion of really large objects," says Daniel Brooks, a scientist with Berkeley Lab's Materials Sciences Division and UC Berkeley's Physics Department.

    Brooks, a member of Dan Stamper-Kurn's research group, is the corresponding author of a paper in the journal Nature describing this research. The paper is titled "Nonclassical light generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics." Co-authors were Thierry Botter, Sydney Schreppler, Thomas Purdy, Nathan Brahms and Stamper-Kurn.

    Light will build-up inside of an optical cavity at specific resonant frequencies, similar to how a held-down guitar string only vibrates to produce specific tones. Positioning a mechanical resonator inside the cavity changes the
    resonance frequency for light passing through, much as sliding one's fingers up and down a guitar string changes its vibrational tones. Meanwhile, as light passes through the optical cavity, it acts like a tiny tractor beam, pushing and pulling on the mechanical resonator.

    If an optical cavity is of ultrahigh quality and the mechanical resonator element within is atomic-sized and chilled to nearly absolute zero, the resulting cavity optomechanical system can be used to detect even the slightest mechanical motion. Likewise, even the tiniest fluctuations in the light/vacuum can cause the atoms to wiggle. Changes to the light can provide control over that atomic motion. This not only opens the door to fundamental studies of quantum mechanics that could tell us more about the "classical" world we humans inhabit, but also to quantum information processing, ultrasensitive force sensors, and other technologies that might seem like science fiction today.

    "There have been proposals to use optomechanical devices as transducers, for example coupling motion to both microwaves and optical frequency light, where one could convert photons from one frequency range to the other," Brooks says. "There have also been proposals for slowing or storing light in the mechanical degrees of freedom, the equivalent of electromagnetically induced transparency or EIT, where a photon is stored within the internal degrees of freedom."

    Already cavity optomechanics has led to applications such as
    the cooling of objects to their motional ground state, and detections of force and motion on the attometer scale. However, in studying interactions between light and mechanical motion, it has been a major challenge to distinguish those effects that are distinctly quantum from those that are classical - a distinction critical to the future exploitation of optomechanics.

    Brooks, Stamper-Kurn and their colleagues were able to meet the challenge with their microfabricated atom-chip system which provides a magnetic trap for capturing a gas made up of thousands of ultracold atoms. This ensemble of ultracold atoms is then transferred into an optical cavity (Fabry-Pferot) where it is trapped in a one-dimensional optical lattice formed by near-infrared (850 nanometer wavelength) light that resonates with the cavity. A second beam of light is used for the pump/probe.

    "Integrating trapped ensembles of ultracold atoms and high-finesse cavities with an atom chip allowed us to study and control the classical and quantum interactions between photons and the internal/external degrees of freedom of the atom ensemble," Brooks says. "In contrast to typical solid-state mechanical systems, our optically levitated ensemble of ultracold atoms is isolated from its environment, causing its motion to be driven predominantly by quantum radiation-pressure fluctuations."

    The Berkeley research team first applied classical light modulation to a low-powered pump/probe beam (36 picoWatts) entering their optical cavity to demonstrate that their system behaves as a high-gain parametric optomechanical amplifier. They then extinguished the classical drive and mapped the response to the fluctuations of the vacuum. This enabled them to observe light being squeezed by its interaction with the vibrating ensemble and the atomic motion driven by the light's quantum fluctuations. Amplification and this squeezing interaction, which is called "ponderomotive force," have been long-sought goals of optomechanics research.

    "Parametric amplification typically requires a lot of power in the optical pump but the small mass of our ensemble required very few photons to turn the interactions on/off," Brooks says. "The ponderomotive squeezing we saw, while narrow in frequency, was a natural consequence of having radiation-pressure shot noise dominate in our system."

    Since squeezing light improves the sensitivity of gravitational wave detectors, the ponderomotive squeezing effects observed by Brooks, Stamper-Kern and their colleagues could play a role in future detectors. The idea behind gravitational wave detection is that a ripple in the local curvature of spacetime caused by a passing gravitational wave will modify the resonant frequency of an optical cavity which, in turn, will alter the cavity's optical signal.

    "Currently, squeezing light over a wide range of frequencies is desirable as scientists search for the first detection of a gravitational wave," Brooks explains. "Ponderomotive squeezing, should be valuable later when specific signals want to be studied in detail by improving the signal-to-noise ratio in the specific frequency range of interest."

    The results of this study differ significantly from standard linear model predictions. This suggests that a nonlinear optomechanical theory is required to account for the Berkeley team's observations that optomechanical interactions generate non-classical light. Stamper-Kern's research group is now considering further experiments involving two ensembles of ultracold atoms inside the optical cavity.

    "The squeezing signal we observe is quite small when we detect the suppression of quantum fluctuations outside the cavity, yet the suppression of these fluctuations should be very large inside the cavity," Brooks says. "With a two ensemble configuration, one ensemble would be responsible for the optomechanical interaction to squeeze the radiation-pressure fluctuations and the second ensemble would be studied to measure the squeezing inside the cavity."

You are reading an archived discussion.

Related Posts

guys u can view all about your protocol just type this in command propt "ipconfig/all"
friends.. i am a final year B.E.(Comp. Sci.) student.. i need ua help to get me some crazy ideas for my final year project.. 😀
hii... actually my college starts giving projects from 6th sem...ie., minor project.. can anyone provide me ideas or project titles for electrical engineering student... i m searching for it but...
hey guys! i have a small trouble, hope it'll be solved soon here.. facing problem in passing array to a function using pointer. while compiling in borland c it says...
In topics like metallurgy and heat treatment processes, we often come across high temperature like upto 800 degree centigrade and above. Now what i would like to know is how...