Banashree Patra
Banashree Patra
Branch Unspecified
13 Jun 2012

arrangement problem

The integers 1, 2,........., 10 are circularly arranged in an arbitrary order. Show that there are always three successive integers in this arrangement, whose sum is at least 17.
Prashanth_p@cchi

Prashanth_p@cchi

Branch Unspecified
6 years ago
Question may be confusing for many! It seems that no one is interested to make an attempt.
Could you please provide us the answer?
Sagar07

Sagar07

Branch Unspecified
6 years ago
Well, it is obvious.... But, i wonder, how can one prove it????????
Ankita Katdare

Ankita Katdare

Computer Science
6 years ago
That is actually a bit difficult to prove.
This a good sequence ->
1, 10, 6, 2, 8, 7, 3, 5, 9, 4.
None of the 3 consecutive numbers have a summation of less than 17 and it is at most 18.
Prashanth_p@cchi

Prashanth_p@cchi

Branch Unspecified
6 years ago
AbraKaDabra
That is actually a bit difficult to prove.
This a good sequence ->
1, 10, 6, 2, 8, 7, 3, 5, 9, 4.
None of the 3 consecutive numbers have a summation of less than 17 and it is at most 18.
how about the one's marked above?
Ankita Katdare

Ankita Katdare

Computer Science
6 years ago
Prashanth_p@cchi
how about the one's marked above?
Oh yes. In a hurry I only checked these
-
1, 10, 6, 2, 8, 7, 3, 5, 9, 4.

1,10,6
10,6,2
2,8,7
8,7,3
9,5,3
5,9,4

Now, that I think about it, since it is a circular arrangement 9,4,1 is also not proper.
Prashanth_p@cchi

Prashanth_p@cchi

Branch Unspecified
6 years ago
I think its impossible! but I might be wrong.

Below is the least in terms of the entire sum, that can be used to satisfy the above criteria.

6,6,5,6,6,5,6,6,5,6 which adds up to - 57

But 1-10 adds up to 55.😔
Saandeep Sreerambatla

Saandeep Sreerambatla

Branch Unspecified
6 years ago
Consider the numbers 1 to 10 are marked as 1 , x1, x2, ... , x9. Not necessarily in the sequence order.

So the number are arranged randomly like this: 1,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9.

We know that sum of numbers from 1 to 10 will add upto 55.

so we will prove it in a negative way, if any of the groups above like (x1+x2+x3) or (x4+x5+x6) or (x7+x8+x9) will add up to < = (less than or equal to) 17. Then the sum 1+x1+...x9 will be <=52 which is wrong.

So atleast one of the section should be greater than 17. (Hence proved 😀 )
Prashanth_p@cchi

Prashanth_p@cchi

Branch Unspecified
6 years ago
English-Scared
Consider the numbers 1 to 10 are marked as 1 , x1, x2, ... , x9. Not necessarily in the sequence order.

So the number are arranged randomly like this: 1,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9.

We know that sum of numbers from 1 to 10 will add upto 55.

so we will prove it in a negative way, if any of the groups above like (x1+x2+x3) or (x4+x5+x6) or (x7+x8+x9) will add up to < = (less than or equal to) 17. Then the sum 1+x1+...x9 will be <=52 which is wrong.

So atleast one of the section should be greater than 17. (Hence proved 😀 )
I agree...... I understood it wrong!

Share this content on your social channels -

Only logged in users can reply.