Quote:
|
They experimented with this concept during WWII & a couple times before. What are the limitations that have kept this concept from being actively used?
|
well its been on the net for 3 years and i have not heard this b4.
can u provide a link to show what you mean?
you are the first to say they have seen it b4.
the zen academy in uk credited me with the design 3 years ago, so i am very surprised to hear this as they would have known if it had been done b4.
ornithopter.org also saw it as unique. nobody there had seen it b4.
i cant say what the other designs limitations may be as i have not seen them yet.
perhaps they used a straight wing instead of the jagged wing which would effect stability?
the only real limitation is that it does not fly very quickly,
other than that - its more stable than a helicopter
and the wingshape actually works like a windmill, using the wind to add momentum to the spin
it would be more efficient than the helicopter fuel-wise and far far less likely to capsize
throw the model in the air at any angle - and it stabilizes almost immediately - something no other aircraft does.
cars use the horizontal axle - but the car design is too heavy.
planes and copters use a spindle instead of an axle. so i cant just
use that.
i need an aircraft engine on a motor car axel - but a light axle.
it also has less moving parts than other aircraft - much cheaper - much safer
just not very fast