|
******************************************
Welcome To CrazyEngineers (CE) – an online community of engineers from all over the world! With the younger CEan at 84 and the youngest at 16, CE boasts of professional engineers, students, professors, entrepreneurs, CEOs, geeks & nerds. We exchange innovative ideas, share knowledge, help each other and expand our worldwide network of engineers! You need not have a formal degree in engineering to be a part of CrazyEngineers! Need we say more? Join CE! | Be a CE Ambassador! | Forgot password? | Sponsor CE | Contact Us |
![]() |
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
CE - Apprentice
![]() ![]()
I'm a Crazy Industrial Engineer
Join Date: 7th August 2007
Posts: 14
|
Thanks friends. Well, after burning many grey cells
, I could list some proposals to minimize the unsavory applications of this technology:http://www.mansouryar.com/Security.aspx Besides, there is a model in my mind to handle it, for the sake of maximizing the best possible fashion of performing it. Since the financial dependence defines the function of any action, a unique way of funding seems vital for this technology. Indeed, all I need is the daily expense of the Iran’s nuclear program, but since the regime has a religious identity, I haven’t accepted to do it as a governmental project. Also, let me drop a hint that applying it as a weapon could – in principle – evaporate this planet within a moment . So as you see, the profound consequences of this technology would be in ethics, psychology and philosophy. The politics and sociology are the next priorities. I mean the redefinitions of state, nation, nationality, border, geographical differences among the countries, immigration, fighting for the ground, etc. My celebrated model, is establishing an entity, public as the SETI project, financially independent like the Greenpeace, and under the supervision of the UNO, like the IAEA, and located in a moderate place for its central office. This would give interests to its collaborators too. I seriously think this is the most humane manner of realizing & managing it. Otherwise, it won’t be done so ideal, because the one who pays, is the one who gets ... BTW, apart from the UN supervision, maybe the media covering it, could be an additional factor too. Let’s engineer this challenge! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
CE - Apprentice
![]() ![]()
I'm a Crazy Industrial Engineer
Join Date: 7th August 2007
Posts: 14
|
On The Spacewarp Technology What I mean by that term, is being initialized from my main paper [1], published at the 2005. It reviews the various theories about moving faster than the speed of light within the framework of the classic general relativity. Also, it suggests a framework for violating the Averaged Null Energy Condition (ANEC) as the strongest theorem for preventing the exotic phenomena in standard physics [2] and further, generating the gross amounts of the required negative energy for a desired geometry. That definite possibility was expanded by author in another paper [3]. The postulated scenarios of interest were to: 1) Considering a null geodesic vector in an asymmetric perforated Casimir cavity with distant enough separated holes, 2) Null energy condition (NEC) violating pulses of the mentioned ray in the asymmetric and symmetric perforated cavity, 3, 4) Doing the same for non-geodesic curves and negative modes of squeezed light, by including suitable engineering, 5) To interpret the NEC violating region as a quantum knot and taking it to at least nano or micrometers distances by the entanglement principle, and 6) Similar to the last scenario; a scenario, inspired by recent experiments involving the quantum teleportation of a single photon in the lab. It is clear if one could satisfy the right hand side of the Einstein gravitational field equations, i.e., the stress-energy tensor, it would yields the left hand side of the equations, i.e., the configuration of the correlated spacetime, automatically. The word “spacewarp”, is a kind of emphasizing on NOT considering the possibility of converting the structure to a closed timelike curve, i.e., time machine or “timewarp”. There are many discussions in the literature about this opinion, however the author believes the nature applies the needed mechanism to avoid the time travels, and specifically, causality violation. One may also see these references [4,5]. Social ramifications, as the initial intent of opening this thread Realizing this affair, surely would cause many results. One could in principle say, there always is a job for me, there always is a physician for my probable illness, the humanity could respond to the regional problems as a whole, e.g., helping the people after an earthquake. The applications range from coding the information and sending them by a beam of photons traversed through a temporal spacewarp, to space mining, colonization of proper spheres in other stellar systems & contacting to another intelligent species in the universe. I am interested to hear more items from the visitors. Also, you can ask other related questions about the subject. Acknowledgement I am thankful to below authors who have referred to my work in their research: F. Rahaman, M. Sarker, A. Ghosh, Dept. of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700 032, India; M. Kalam, Dept. of Phys. , Netaji Nagar College for Women, Regent Estate, Kolkata-700092, India; B. C. Bhui, S. Chakraborty, Dept. of Maths., Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, Kolkata-700150, India; B. Raychaudhuri Dept. of Phys., Surya Sen Mahavidyalaya, Siliguri, West Bengal, India. References [1] Mansouryar, M., “On a macroscopic traversable spacewarp in practice,” (2005), http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0511086, [2] Olum, K. D., Graham, N., “Achronal averaged null energy condition,” (2007), http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3193, [3] Mansouryar, M., “Can the Present Technology Create Gross Amounts of Negative Energy Density?,” in these proceedings of Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF-2007), edited by M. S. El-Genk, American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, 2007. [4] Krasnikov, S., “The time travel paradox,” Phys. Rev. D65, 064013 (2002). [5] Krasnikov, S., “No time machines in classical general relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 4109 (2002). Last edited by mansouryar : 31st August 2007 at 05:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
CE - Apprentice
![]() ![]()
I'm a Crazy Industrial Engineer
Join Date: 7th August 2007
Posts: 14
|
I can change the world in a definite way: working on the theories and experiments. Changing the generations and cultures is not my expertise; it needs long enough periods, not missing the historical chances and attending to the bright minds.
If one likens the current situation of the nations and their positions in respect to each other, to an inhomogeneous mountain, (e.g., the US, Canada, NZ are placed at tops of the wealth and comfort, and some African countries are placed at the valleys of the level of life); realizing such a revolutionary technology could be likened as a flood which equals all the residents of that hypothetical mountain onto the surface of the pumped water, where all of the people are swimming in a common ocean. Imagine the geographical distance among the richest people of this planet to the poorest ones can be gone within a few moments, corresponding to its virtual instance, World Wide Web. Anyway, this would make its clearest political influences on the UN. IMO, the US is not a good host for that, maybe Switzerland or another neutral region is better. Anyway, accepting the Spacewarp technology throughout the world would convert millions of the troops to the cops and appropriating the related removed military costs (an astronomical number?!) to some other more useful affairs like funding the medical and educational institutes seems like a dream. Just think about this picture, one global union, one army, one president and one responsible agency to maintain the security issues of this communicational net. In a different POV, it might be a fortune that I’m in Iran (and I cannot leave here in a near future), away from the western intelligence services and the politicians who might think this innovation is unchristian, or it has to be kept as a monopoly in the (secret) black projects for indefinite years, until presenting some novel markets at unfair service of quite a few individuals/groups. I need to make a balance in my activities and this task is too hard indeed. One is dealing with it as a noble and sophisticated end that needs to be reviewed more and deeper by other researchers (a slow process), another is acting as quickly as possible to verify it more seriously at last, a requirement of a successful commercialization and a condition of establishing a confident sense too (sooner than others, if I’m a responsible person). Thinking before acting, is the vital necessity of reaching to this attractive quest. Any other thoughts, friends? See this too: http://www.scientificblogging.com/ma..._of_a_stargate |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.crazyengineers.com/forum/ce-labs/1112-remove-gap-between-north-south-countries-spacewarp-technology.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| A World Peace Forum - Spacewarp Project | This thread | Refback | 5th April 2008 06:30 AM | |
| A World Peace Forum - Spacewarp Project | This thread | Refback | 5th April 2008 06:18 AM | |
| Digg / Space / Upcoming | This thread | Refback | 7th January 2008 11:08 PM | |
| Contact Us - Home - Impressum | Impressum - |