Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aashima
Overclocking means increasing the working frequency of an electronic component, in this case the processor; using a CPU with higher working frequency means better performances. If you obtain a working frequency of 450 Mhz from a processor with default frequency of 300 Mhz, the performance is the same of that obtained with the version at 450 MHz of the same processor; in a few words, if you achieve a specific working frequency with overclocking, you can obtain the same performance of the version having as default the overclocked frequency.
so there is no harm in overclocking as it provides u with better performance with a low performance chip...
|
There are many factors taken into account before the frequency of a chip is recommended. Most important of these are the internal bus and response times of the chip.
A chip has bus speed of X bits/sec can only ensure that X bits would be successfully transmitted in a second. Any attempt to pump in more data in one second would corrupt the data. Over-clocking precisely does that.
An interrupt that is generated by a peripheral need to stay alive for a while so that the interrupt is detected. If the signal falls too early than the interrupt is not detected and peripheral fails. Over-clocking can do that.
These are only two examples. There can be hundreds of such examples.
If over-clocking can help, I would clock my 3.0Ghz PIV at 3.0Thz and convert my computer into a super-computer. But the bad news is, things simply wont work that way. Working and default frequiencies are two more words in the jargon list. Most engineers who design boards keep working frequiency at the default recommended frequency.