I can change the world in a definite way: working on the theories and experiments. Changing the generations and cultures is not my expertise; it needs long enough periods, not missing the historical chances and attending to the bright minds.
If one likens the current situation of the nations and their positions in respect to each other, to an inhomogeneous mountain, (e.g., the US, Canada, NZ are placed at tops of the wealth and comfort, and some African countries are placed at the valleys of the level of life); realizing such a revolutionary technology could be likened as a flood which equals all the residents of that hypothetical mountain onto the surface of the pumped water, where all of the people are swimming in a common ocean.
Imagine the geographical distance among the richest people of this planet to the poorest ones can be gone within a few moments, corresponding to its virtual instance, World Wide Web.
Anyway, this would make its clearest political influences on the UN. IMO, the US is not a good host for that, maybe Switzerland or another neutral region is better.
Anyway, accepting the Spacewarp technology throughout the world would convert millions of the troops to the cops and appropriating the related removed military costs (an astronomical number?!) to some other more useful affairs like funding the medical and educational institutes seems like a dream. Just think about this picture, one global union, one army, one president and one responsible agency to maintain the security issues of this communicational net.
In a different POV, it might be a fortune that I’m in Iran (and I cannot leave here in a near future), away from the western intelligence services and the politicians who might think this innovation is unchristian, or it has to be kept as a monopoly in the (secret) black projects for indefinite years, until presenting some novel markets at unfair service of quite a few individuals/groups.
I need to make a balance in my activities and this task is too hard indeed. One is dealing with it as a noble and sophisticated end that needs to be reviewed more and deeper by other researchers (a slow process), another is acting as quickly as possible to verify it more seriously at last, a requirement of a successful commercialization and a condition of establishing a confident sense too (sooner than others, if I’m a responsible person).
Thinking before acting, is the vital necessity of reaching to this attractive quest. Any other thoughts, friends?
See this too:
http://www.scientificblogging.com/ma..._of_a_stargate