Thanks friends. Well, after burning many grey cells
, I could list some proposals to minimize the unsavory applications of this technology:
http://www.mansouryar.com/Security.aspx
Besides, there is a model in my mind to handle it, for the sake of maximizing the best possible fashion of performing it. Since the financial dependence defines the function of any action, a unique way of funding seems vital for this technology. Indeed, all I need is the
daily expense of the Iran’s nuclear program, but since the regime has a religious identity, I haven’t accepted to do it as a governmental project. Also, let me drop a hint that applying it as a weapon could – in principle – evaporate this planet within a moment
. So as you see, the profound consequences of this technology would be in ethics, psychology and philosophy. The politics and sociology are the next priorities. I mean the redefinitions of state, nation, nationality, border, geographical differences among the countries, immigration, fighting for the ground, etc.
My celebrated model, is establishing an entity, public as the
SETI project, financially independent like the
Greenpeace, and under the supervision of the UNO, like the IAEA, and located in a moderate place for its central office. This would give interests to its collaborators too. I seriously think this is the most humane manner of realizing & managing it. Otherwise, it won’t be done so ideal, because the one who pays, is the one who gets ...
BTW, apart from the UN supervision, maybe the media covering it, could be an additional factor too. Let’s engineer this challenge!
